Morning,
On 09/16/2010 04:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I agree. I've already said my piece on how I think that stuff would
> need to be reworked to be acceptable, so we might have to agree to
> disagree on those, especially if your goal is to get something
> committed that doesn't involve a major rewrite on your end.
Just for clarification: you are referring to imessages and dynshmem
here, right? I agree that dynshmem needs to be reworked and rethought.
And imessages simply depends on dynshmem.
If you are referring to the bgworker stuff, I'm not quite clear about
what I could do to make bgworker more acceptable. (Except perhaps for
removing the dependency on imessages).
Regards
Markus Wanner
