Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure how clear it is on Win32 that 128 is a special return
> > code.
>
> I asked Microsoft platform support (roughly) that question. Here's the response:
I assume we are going to summarize this in a C comment when we ignore
128 return codes.
Can we assume all the mutexes will be cleaned up from a 128-exit?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
