Re: Version Numbering - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Version Numbering
Date
Msg-id 4C6EDFAD.1000501@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Version Numbering  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Version Numbering
List pgsql-hackers
> Yes, well, it's still implicit, isn't it?

But the last .0 in 9.0.0 is the patch level, effectively.  This makes
that .0 inappropriate for betas; the beta number is the patch level,
i.e. 9.0.beta4.  It doesn't make any sense to have a 9.0.0beta4, since
we're never going to have a 9.0.2beta4.

The betas are pre-.0.  Maybe we should have 9.0.(-3) instead. Or 8.9.97?;-)

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [Glue] Deadlock bug
Next
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering