Re: Version Numbering - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Version Numbering
Date
Msg-id 04F4CDDE-886D-4F51-8BDD-31911532CF36@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Version Numbering  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: Version Numbering
Re: Version Numbering
Re: Version Numbering
List pgsql-hackers
On Aug 20, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:

> +1 for Tom's post.
>
> 20.Ağu.2010 tarihinde 21:40 saatinde, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> şunları yazdı:
>
>> .0 is for releases, not betas.  I see no need for an extra number in
>> beta versions.

Yes, well, it's still implicit, isn't it?

David




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] COPY FROM/TO losing a single byte of a multibyte UTF-8 sequence