Re: pgbench results on a new server - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: pgbench results on a new server
Date
Msg-id 4C24FD82.4070100@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgbench results on a new server  (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>)
Responses Re: pgbench results on a new server
List pgsql-performance
Craig James wrote:
> I've got a new server and want to make sure it's running well.

Any changes to the postgresql.conf file?  Generally you need at least a
moderate shared_buffers (1GB or so at a minimum) and checkpoint_segments
(32 or higher) in order for the standard pgbench test to give good results.


> pgbench -c20 -t 5000 -U test
> tps = 5789
> pgbench -c30 -t 3333 -U test
> tps = 6961
> pgbench -c40 -t 2500 -U test
> tps = 2945

General numbers are OK, the major drop going from 30 to 40 clients is
larger than it should be.  I'd suggest running the 40 client count one
again to see if that's consistent.  If it is, that may just be pgbench
itself running into a problem.  It doesn't handle high client counts
very well unless you use the 9.0 version that supports multiple pgbench
workers with the "-j" option.

--
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench results on a new server
Next
From: tony@exquisiteimages.com
Date:
Subject: Architecting a database