Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Date
Msg-id 4C20B89F0200002500032817@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> We might not want to enable them by default, though.
I have a hard time believing that "enabled by default" is a problem
with the default timings.  That would result in sending and
receiving one small packet every two hours on an open connection
with no application traffic.
In what environment do you see that causing a problem (compared to
no keepalive)?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq