Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From KaiGai Kohei
Subject Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS
Date
Msg-id 4C04DB46.6020406@kaigai.gr.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS
List pgsql-hackers
(2010/06/01 18:08), Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 01/06/10 11:39, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> Any operators eventually invokes a function
>> being correctly installed, but an assumption is that we can trust operators,
>> index access method, type input/output methods, conversions and so on, because
>> these features have to be installed by DBA (or initdb).
> 
> Operators can be created by regular users.
> 
Oops, I missed it. Indeed, operator function is not limited to C-language
functions, so regular users can create it.

Apart from the topic, does it seem to you reasonable direction to tackle to
the leaky VIEWs problem?

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS