Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS
Date
Msg-id 4C04CE15.4010902@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/06/10 11:39, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Any operators eventually invokes a function
> being correctly installed, but an assumption is that we can trust operators,
> index access method, type input/output methods, conversions and so on, because
> these features have to be installed by DBA (or initdb).

Operators can be created by regular users.

--  Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5487: dblink failed with 63 bytes connection names
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature