Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joachim Worringen
Subject Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables
Date
Msg-id 4BFB91A8.20805@iathh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables
Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables
List pgsql-performance
Am 25.05.2010 10:49, schrieb Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz:
> temporary tables are handled pretty much like the regular table. The
> magic happens on schema level, new schema is setup for connection, so
> that it can access its own temporary tables.
> Temporary tables also are not autovacuumed.
> And that's pretty much the most of the differences.

Thanks. So, the Write-Ahead-Logging (being used or not) does not matter?

And, is there anything like RAM-only tables? I really don't care whether
the staging data is lost on the rare event of a machine crash, or
whether the query crashes due to lack of memory (I make sure there's
enough w/o paging) - I only care about performance here.

  Joachim


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables