Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
Date
Msg-id 4BEAFFA4.7050600@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>   
>> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié may 12 14:07:13 -0400 2010:
>>     
>>> We could try to make this a supported build arrangement, but I'm
>>> inclined to think that a cleaner solution is to split out the loadable
>>> module as a separate contrib subdirectory.  Thoughts?
>>>       
>
>   
>> Do you mean contrib/pg_upgrade/somelib?  If so, +1.
>>     
>
> Hmm.  I had been thinking the other way, but I'll see if that can be
> made to work.
>
>             
>   

Not sure this will work on its own with the MSVC build system - I don't 
think it's set up for sub-modules. But we can finessee that if 
necessary, just as we make special provision for pgcrypto.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: comment needs to be updated for HS?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby