Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
Date
Msg-id 4214.1273692624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>>> Do you mean contrib/pg_upgrade/somelib?  If so, +1.
>> 
>> Hmm.  I had been thinking the other way, but I'll see if that can be
>> made to work.

> Not sure this will work on its own with the MSVC build system - I don't 
> think it's set up for sub-modules.

Oh, right.  Since the entire point here is to *not* require new
buildsystem infrastructure for pg_upgrade, I'm back to thinking that
a separate contrib module is the way to go.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful