Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date
Msg-id 4B79110A.3090809@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Leonardo F <m_lists@yahoo.it>)
Responses Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
List pgsql-hackers
Leonardo F wrote:
> But there's something I don't understand: I didn't add the patch to the next
> CommitFest because I thought it could never be added in 9.0 (because it adds a
> new "feature" which has never been discussed). Hence I thought it should have
> been "discussed" (not properly "reviewed") out of a CommitFest.
> The "Submission timing" section talks about "beta phase", not "alpha phase", so
> I'm stll confused...
> In other words: should patches that won't be included in the next release
> (because it's too late) still added to the next CommitFest? 

Yes. There's not going to be any more commitfests for this release, so
the next commitfest is for 9.1.

(don't worry about the lack of enthusiasm for the patch, people are just
very busy with 9.0 and don't have the energy to think about 9.1 material
at this point)

--  Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Leonardo F
Date:
Subject: Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Next
From: Takahiro Itagaki
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add psql tab completion for DO blocks.