Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Date
Msg-id 4B750544.40104@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> -1. it isn't necessary for PITR. It's a new requirement for
>>> standby_mode='on', unless we add the file size check into the backend. I
>>> think we should add the file size check to the backend instead and save
>>> admins the headache.
>> I think the file size check needs to be in the backend purely on safety
>> grounds.  Whether we make pg_standby useful for this context is a
>> different discussion.
> 
> Happy with that.

Committed such a check now.

--  Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew McNamara
Date:
Subject: Re: Confusion over Python drivers {license}
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Parameter name standby_mode