Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From KaiGai Kohei
Subject Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date
Msg-id 4B622063.9030808@ak.jp.nec.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
(2010/01/28 18:21), Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>
> KaiGai Kohei<kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>  wrote:
>
>> The attached patch uses one TOC entry for each blob objects.
>
> When I'm testing the new patch, I found "ALTER LARGE OBJECT" command
> returns "ALTER LARGEOBJECT" tag. Should it be "ALTER LARGE(space)OBJECT"
> instead?  As I remember, we had decided not to use LARGEOBJECT
> (without a space) in user-visible messages, right?

Sorry, I left for fix this tag when I was pointed out LARGEOBJECT should
be LARGE(space)OBJECT.

Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Typed Table
Next
From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
Date:
Subject: returning array in a field together with other types