Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Takahiro Itagaki
Subject Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date
Msg-id 20100128182143.9795.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote:

> The attached patch uses one TOC entry for each blob objects.

When I'm testing the new patch, I found "ALTER LARGE OBJECT" command
returns "ALTER LARGEOBJECT" tag. Should it be "ALTER LARGE(space)OBJECT"
instead?  As I remember, we had decided not to use LARGEOBJECT
(without a space) in user-visible messages, right?

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tim Bunce
Date:
Subject: Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Typed Table