>
> What is the point of this discussion? We're not going to remove the
> facility for composite types, regardless of whether or not some people
> regard them as unnecessary. And "a name that better suits the task" is
> not to be sneered at anyway.
>
I never asked for anything to be removed nor do I sneer :) Honestly, I
was only trying to understand why it existed.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
