> Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something*
> on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally
> considered to be beta quality. I don't think that really helps
> much though; it just means we need more time in beta.
Well, we're shipping an alpha, aren't we?
My proposal for "beta in 2 weeks" was based on the idea of having *no*
new patches in CF4, at all. Given the reality of HS+SR, I don't think
it's realistic anymore either.
--Josh Berkus
