Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> As an example, if people were using such functionality then the DBA
>>> couldn't start preloading plperl for performance without breaking
>>> behavior that some of his users might be depending on.
>>>
>
>
>> If we made plperl.on_perl_init PGC_POSTMASTER and the other two
>> PGC_SUSET would that alloy your concerns?
>>
>
> No, they have to all be PGC_POSTMASTER to answer that concern. Only
> breaking things for superusers isn't really that big an improvement
> over breaking them for everybody.
>
>
>
Well, I don't know about Tim but I think I could live with that. And
when we get some actual experience with using them we'll have a better
handle on whether or not it gives us any pain.
cheers
andrew
