Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> BTW, something that's been bothering me a bit with this patch is that we
>> now have to link the backend with libpq. I don't see an immediate
>> problem with that, but I'm not a packager. Does anyone see a problem
>> with that?
>
> Yeah, I have a problem with that. What's the backend doing with libpq?
> It's not receiving this data, it's sending it.
walreceiver is a postmaster subprocess too.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
