Re: SSD + RAID - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Craig James
Subject Re: SSD + RAID
Date
Msg-id 4B005C32.3090509@emolecules.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSD + RAID  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Responses Re: SSD + RAID
List pgsql-performance
I've wondered whether this would work for a read-mostly application: Buy a big RAM machine, like 64GB, with a crappy
littlesingle disk.  Build the database, then make a really big RAM disk, big enough to hold the DB and the WAL.  Then
builda duplicate DB on another machine with a decent disk (maybe a 4-disk RAID10), and turn on WAL logging. 

The system would be blazingly fast, and you'd just have to be sure before you shut it off to shut down Postgres and
copythe RAM files back to the regular disk.  And if you didn't, you could always recover from the backup.  Since it's a
read-mostlysystem, the WAL logging bandwidth wouldn't be too high, so even a modest machine would be able to keep up. 

Any thoughts?

Craig

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: FTS performance with the Polish config
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: SSD + RAID