Petr Jelinek napsal(a): <blockquote cite="mid:4ACA7962.7090804@pjmodos.net" type="cite"> Tom Lane napsal(a):
<blockquotecite="mid:5876.1254782904@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre>Petr Jelinek <a href="mailto:pjmodos@pjmodos.net"
moz-do-not-send="true"><pjmodos@pjmodos.net></a>writes: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre>Tom Lane napsal(a):
</pre><blockquotetype="cite"><pre>One thing that seems like it's likely to be an annoyance in practice
is the need to explicitly do DROP OWNED BY to get rid of pg_default_acl
entries for a role to be dropped. </pre></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><pre>Yeah I am not happy
aboutthis either but there is not much we can do
about it. Btw I think in the version I sent in REASSIGN OWNED acted as
DROP OWNED for default ACLs. </pre></blockquote><pre>IIRC it just threw a warning, which didn't seem tremendously
usefulto
me. </pre></blockquote><br /> Oh did it ? Then I must have discarded that idea for some reason. I probably didn't want
tobe too pushy there.<br /><br /></blockquote><br /> Now I remember why - consistency with ACLs on object. REASSIGN
OWNEDdoes not drop any GRANTed ACLs on any object, so it seemed appropriate to only drop default ACLs in DROP OWNED BY
alongwith ACLs on objects.<br /><br /><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)</pre>
