Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Date
Msg-id 4ACA7962.7090804@pjmodos.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs  (Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane napsal(a): <blockquote cite="mid:5876.1254782904@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Petr Jelinek <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"href="mailto:pjmodos@pjmodos.net"><pjmodos@pjmodos.net></a> writes:
</pre><blockquotetype="cite"><pre wrap="">Tom Lane napsal(a):   </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">One thing
thatseems like it's likely to be an annoyance in practice
 
is the need to explicitly do DROP OWNED BY to get rid of pg_default_acl
entries for a role to be dropped.     </pre></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Yeah I am
nothappy about this either but there is not much we can do 
 
about it. Btw I think in the version I sent in REASSIGN OWNED acted as 
DROP OWNED for default ACLs.   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
IIRC it just threw a warning, which didn't seem tremendously useful to
me. </pre></blockquote><br /> Oh did it ? Then I must have discarded that idea for some reason. I probably didn't want
tobe too pushy there.<br /><br /><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
 
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)</pre>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: moving system catalogs to another tablespace