Hi,
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> PostGIS is not a fork. Not sure where that idea comes from.
Neither do I personally consider Postgres-R a fork. I still think of it
as a (rather huge) patch, a bit like SE-PostgreSQL. However, it clearly
depends on your definition of what a "fork" is.
Maybe "based on Postgres" or similar would better describe the list (and
allow even more projects to be named)?
Regards
Markus Wanner
