> On 06 May 2016, at 00:46, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote:
>
> On 06/05/16 07:44, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I see we're already a bit inconsistent here. The problem with using
>> a ts_ prefix, to my mind, is that it offers no option for distinguishing
>> tsvector from tsquery, should you need to do that. Maybe this isn't a
>> problem for functions that have tsvector as input.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
> use tsv_ and tsq_?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Gavin
>
That would be a good convention if we were able to easily rename old functions.
But now that will just create another pattern on top of three existing (no prefix, ts_*, tsvector_*).
Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
