Josh Berkus wrote:
> Michael,
>
>
>> Have an example at hand? I'd argue that in a case of a function of more
>> complexity from a code clarity standpoint you'd want to assign to a new
>> variable that describes what the new value reflects.
>>
>
> Depends on what programming language you're used to. For those of us
> who do a lot of pass-by-reference in our non-database code, reusing the
> IN variable is "natural". I know not being able to is a longstanding
> annoyance for me.
>
>
>
It's the pass by reference case that would be dangerous, in fact. The
fact that in C all function parameters are passed by value (unlike, say,
FORTRAN) is what makes it safe to modify them inside the function.
Anyway, debates about such thigs tend to get a bit religious. getting
more practical, I'm slightly inclined to say Steve Prentice has made a
good enough case for doing this.
cheers
andrew
