On 8/17/09 11:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I went over this quickly, and attach an updated version. This is
> updated to current CVS HEAD, and wordsmithed a little bit, and I removed
> some things that didn't seem worth documenting. In particular, the
> introduction claims that back-patched bug fixes won't be documented
> here, which I agree with (at least for minor fixes); but that policy
> wasn't being applied consistently.
I thought the Windows memory thing was a back-patch?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
