Re: machine-readable explain output v4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: machine-readable explain output v4
Date
Msg-id 4A7F6E5D.2040703@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: machine-readable explain output v4  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: machine-readable explain output v4  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: machine-readable explain output v4  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: machine-readable explain output v4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Andres Freund wrote:
>>> BTW, has anyone tried validating the XML at all? I just looked very
>>> briefly at the patch at
>>> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01944.php> and
>>> I noticed this which makes me suspicious:
>>>
>>> +     if (es.format == EXPLAIN_FORMAT_XML)
>>> +         appendStringInfoString(es.str,
>>> +             "<explain 
>>> xmlns=\"http://www.postgresql.org/2009/explain\"
>>> <http://www.postgresql.org/2009/explain%5C%22>;>\n");
>>>     
>> That bug is fixed - as referenced above I wrote a schema and 
>> validated it. So, yes, the generated XML was valid at least before 
>> the last round of refactoring. And I looked through the output quite 
>> a bit so I would surprised if there is such a breakage.
>> then someone needs to update the commitfest page with the lastest 
>> patch. That's the link I followed.
>>
>>
>>     
>
> Hmm. I wonder how i got the link to an old version of the patch.
>
> Anyway, I'm glad it's fixed.


I takle it back. It's still there at 
<http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg00485.php> 
posted 3 days ago.


cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output v4
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output v4