Re: revised hstore patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: revised hstore patch
Date
Msg-id 4A7EBFCB.1040105@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: revised hstore patch  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: revised hstore patch
List pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>   
>> Perhaps an appropriate thing to do is separate out the representation
>> change from the other new features, and apply just the latter for now.
>> Or maybe we should think about having two versions of hstore.  This
>> is all tied up in the problem of having a decent module infrastructure
>> (which I hope somebody is working on for 8.5).  I don't know where
>> we're going to end up for 8.5, but I'm disinclined to let a fairly
>> minor contrib feature improvement break upgrade-compatibility before
>> we've even really started the cycle.
>>     
>
> I can just have pg_migrator detect hstore and require it be removed
> before upgrading;  we did that already for 8.3 to 8.4 and I am assuming
> we will continue to have cases there pg_migrator just will not work.
>
>   

The more things you exclude the less useful the tool will be. I'm 
already fairly sure it will be unusable for all or almost all my clients 
who use 8.3.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Mansion
Date:
Subject: Re: slow commits with heavy temp table usage in 8.4.0
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: revised hstore patch