Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
>> Ummmmm ... you didn't break things, did you? Specifically as far as old
>> builds are concerned?? There is a reason why we have an older flex on
>> that machine :(
>
> It should be all right to update svr1 to something more recent. We know
> that flex 2.5.33 or .35 will work for all supported release branches;
> people (and the buildfarm in particular) have been testing that for a
> long time.
I didn't actually replace the old flex - I just installed a newer one
from ports in addition to the still existing one from the OS. Only the
snapshot generation script for -HEAD got modified to actually look for
that specific flex version.
Stefan
