Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Date
Msg-id 4A1FF431.2070606@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python  (David Blewett <david@dawninglight.net>)
Responses Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

David Blewett wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net 
> <mailto:andrew@dunslane.net>> wrote:
>
>     Does Python 3 have some sort of usable sandbox that would mean we
>     could have a trusted plpython?
>
>
> I brought this up last August [1]. Zope has a working sandbox that 
> they include in their distribution.
>
>
> 1. 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/9d1f8d830808041008v50104fd8p6181d5ddce85a6a@mail.gmail.com 
>

How many python installations have this gadget? If the answer is "not 
many" then it's not much good to us, unless someone wants to create 
PL/zope-sandbox. Really, something like this should be part of a 
standard python installation.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions