Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>
>> Personally, if we're tracking stuff through special dependancies which
>> pg_dump will be aware of anyway, I don't see why extension objects
>> should go into a special schema.
>>
>
> Well, we could certainly take that attitude and eliminate all this
> hassle ;-). However, I think that more-flexible search path handling
> might have other uses, so I don't see any reason not to think about it.
>
>
>
+1
I think Josh is right about extensions, but we certainly do need more
powerful tools to manipulate the search path.
cheers
andrew
