Re: search_path vs extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: search_path vs extensions
Date
Msg-id 21443.1243469928@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: search_path vs extensions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: search_path vs extensions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: search_path vs extensions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Personally, if we're tracking stuff through special dependancies which 
> pg_dump will be aware of anyway, I don't see why extension objects 
> should go into a special schema.

Well, we could certainly take that attitude and eliminate all this
hassle ;-).  However, I think that more-flexible search path handling
might have other uses, so I don't see any reason not to think about it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions