Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?
Date
Msg-id 49DD03A3.9070700@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Responses Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?
List pgsql-general
Sam Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 04:56:35PM +0100, Ian Mayo wrote:
>> One more thing:  hey, did you hear?  I just got some advice from Tom Lane!
>
> Statistically speaking; he's the person most likely to answer you by

Even so, this might be the #1 advantage of Postgres over Oracle (cost
being #2).

Unless you're one of their ten biggest customers, I imagine it'd take
quite some time to similar support from the core team's counterparts
of the other big databases.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Date:
Subject: Re: No return from trigger function
Next
From: Kashmir
Date:
Subject: some external sql not working in psql