Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date
Msg-id 49CFE92A.8000101@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4  ("Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-performance
On 3/15/09 1:40 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>
>
> decibel wrote:
>> On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>>> Fair enough.. Well I am now appealing to all who has a fairly decent
>>> sized hardware want to try it out and see whether there are "gains",
>>> "no-changes" or "regressions" based on your workload. Also it will
>>> help if you report number of cpus when you respond back to help
>>> collect feedback.

EAStress (the J2EE benchmark from Spec) would be perfect for this, and
we (community) have a license for it.

However, EAstress really requires 2-3 J2EE servers to keep the DB server
busy.

--Josh

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Marc Mamin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Very specialised query
Next
From: Matthew Wakeling
Date:
Subject: Re: Very specialised query