Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> True, but the relative wakeup order of two different processes is not
> important since by definition they are working on different
> transactions. As long as the WAL writes for a single transaction (in a
> single process) are not reordered you're fine.
I'm not totally sure, but I think I understand what you mean here,
indipendent transactions by definition don't care about relative ordering.
.TM.
