Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Couldn't you get rid of PMSIGNAL_RECOVERY_COMPLETED altogether? If the
>> startup process exits with code 0, recovery is complete, else there
>> was trouble. I find this SetPostmasterSignal bit quite ugly anyway.
>
> Right now, the startup process exits with code 0 also when it's told to
> exit with SIGTERM, ie. fast shutdown request, and the recovery-completed
> signal is used to differentiate those cases. But yeah, we can use
> another exit code for that. I'll look into that approach.
Committed that.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
