Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Frost
Subject Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?
Date
Msg-id 4982671C.9020801@frostconsultingllc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?  (Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>)
Responses Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Jeff Frost wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com> writes:
>>> Tom one thing I noticed recently is that pg_dumpall --globals doesn't
>>> seem to pick up when you alter the GUCs at the database level and
>>> neither does pg_dump.  How should you dump to grab that per-database
>>> stuff?
>>
>> Regular pg_dumpall will catch that.
>>
>> There's been some previous discussion about redrawing the dividing lines
>> so that this doesn't fall between the cracks when you try to use
>> --globals plus per-database pg_dump, but AFAIR nothing's been done about
>> it yet.  It's a bit tricky since it's not entirely clear who's
>> responsible for creating the individual databases when you restore in
>> that scenario.
>
> I guess I could pg_dumpall -s | grep "ALTER DATABASE" to grab that stuff.
>
That seems silly.  Is this the best way to find this data:

SELECT name, setting FROM pg_settings where source = 'database' ORDER BY
name;

?

--
Jeff Frost, Owner     <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>
Frost Consulting, LLC     http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 916-647-6411    FAX: 916-405-4032


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?