Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning)
Date
Msg-id 4981F725.1060109@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh,

> Someone submits patch
>  ticket is created
>  reviewer takes ticket
>  comments
> submitter takes ticket
>  fixes based on comments
> review takes ticket
>  approves
> if reviewer is a committers, he commits.
> if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to "need final review"
> tickets that are in that state are reviewed by commiters.
> 
> Sounds like standard stuff to me.

But that's *not* actually how we do things.  So you're making my point.


--Josh


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: reloptions with a "namespace"