Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> SE-Linux: this patch has effectively been in development for 2 years
>> ourside the core process before putting it in; the forked SEPostgres is in
>> use in production. KaiGai has been available for 20 hours a week (or more)
>> to troubleshoot issues and change APIs. I really don't see what the problem
>> is with committing it.
>>
>
> it hasn't been testing by ours in different platforms (ie: ubuntu has
> selinux and i want to give it a try, badly enough i have never used
> selinux so this is new to me)...
>
> nor we have any evidence that it doesn't affect to users that doesn't
> have any variant of selinux (ie: windows)... the real problem here is
> the base of users we enough knowledge of the tool to make some usefull
> tests
It is obvious, if you see the code.
When SELinux is disabled by platform or GUC option, security hooks
works nothing.
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
