On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Not really. We have nowhere else to recommend, since we don't run a
> replacement for it. And we really don't want to get involved in
> listing all the different third party sites out there. (For example,
> we had a reference to sourceforge.net in the same paragraph. And while
> that was certainly "state of the art" when the docs were written, I
> don't think anybody sane would recommend that today. The reality keeps
> changing on those things, so it really doesn't belong in the docs). We
> could put a set of links on the wiki if we want something "more live".
Ah, then perhaps a link to such a wiki page would suffice. I think that would be a good compromise.
David
