Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?
Date
Msg-id 495cf2e2-6c76-0122-d15c-d271bf490ca4@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08.10.21 00:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> As far as that goes, I thought we had a policy against auto-detecting
> user-visible features.  From memory, the rationale goes like "if you
> want feature X you should say so, so that the build will fail if we
> can't provide it".  Thus we make you say something like --with-openssl
> even though it wouldn't be particularly hard to auto-detect.  Peter E.
> can probably advocate more strongly for this approach.

Yeah, there used to be RPMs shipped that accidentally omitted readline 
support.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Reword docs of feature "Remove temporary files after backend crash"