Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I think we should just leave it alone for 8.4, and fix it properly in a
>> future relase by implementing WAL-logging for hash indexes.
>
> You really think we should just leave it alone? That gives me less work,
> so I will accept that if you think so. Gives me the shivers though.
At least you ought to feel free to treat it as an independent problem
from your current project.