Re: When to hold Pg East - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Subject | Re: When to hold Pg East |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4940E813.6000706@hagander.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: When to hold Pg East (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Responses |
Re: When to hold Pg East
|
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Treat wrote: > On Wednesday 10 December 2008 20:02:16 Josh Berkus wrote: >>> You also might want to throw a disclaimer into the date area that voting >>> for "Late May" would still respect the PGCon schedule. As the second >>> mover here, I think your only viable options here are snuggling up next >>> to it (East on May {15/}16/17 would open an interesting combo trip >>> possibility for long distance travellers, PHL->YYZ is a quick flight), >>> or staying clear of that period altogether. > > PHL->YYZ might be a quick flight, but pgcon is in ottowa (aka yow), not > toronto. (In fairness I think PHL->YOW isnt too bad, though it will make it > harder to get a direct flight) > >> Making it back-to-back with pgCon would make things easier on speakers. > > really? for most people, first you have to work out how to get to Philly, and > then work out how to get from there to Ottowa, and then get back to some > place other than Philly, which makes getting arragements that much more > difficult. Unless east was actually in Ottowa, I think this makes things > harder. In a lot of cases it would. It would also mean you're away from the office two weeks in a row, instead of two weeks with work in between. Which may be a whole lot harder to manage. It would help a bit with the travel time for long distance, yes, but it's not a huge difference. And I guess it helps a little bit with the travel cost, but again not all that much. But those are in my experience often not the problem - the problem is being away from the office. >> However, it would likely decrease both attendence and sponsorships for >> each conference. Agreed. > Amazing how that problem keeps coming up... I can't wait till jdcon gives up > its stubborness and moves itself to the other side of the calendar... > Finding some sort of "even spread" of the dates for larger PostgreSQL conferences would certainly be much better. Having -west right before pgday.eu was a bad move, IMHO. Having -east right next to pgcon would be another one. We have an events page on the wiki (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Events). How about we add an indicator (column or color) for "postgresql major" events or something (right now, I'd list FOSDEM and pgcon on the list - but I don't know the details about the others). That would give a good overview of how well spread out these are... //Magnus
pgsql-advocacy by date: