Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave, that isn't true. In the last six months that page has become a
> much more clearly defined portal for software "not" postgresql.org. Yes
> we have always "supported" our partners/sponsors/tertiary projects but
> never has it been so clearly in your face.
>
> Now I am not saying we should change it (basically because I don't have
> a better answer) but I do think it is important to recognize, publicly
> the pandering to others we are starting to do.
Naturally I'm biased but I don't see anything wrong with informing users
of third-party installers or software appliances that might make it
easier for them to try out pgsql or use it in their environment.
I don't see how informing users is the same as pandering to others, so
long as users understand where the postgresql project ends the
third-party projects begin.
Cheers,
Liraz
