Re: Does a GRANT on a table cascade/implied to its SEQUENCES - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Does a GRANT on a table cascade/implied to its SEQUENCES
Date
Msg-id 4920.1153801157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Does a GRANT on a table cascade/implied to its SEQUENCES  ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org>)
Responses Re: Does a GRANT on a table cascade/implied to its SEQUENCES  ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org>)
List pgsql-general
"Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org> writes:
> I've add a new user and as I go though granting various accesses to the
> different tables I realized many of those tables have primary keys that
> are generated by a sequence.

> Do I need to grant access on the sequences and what type of access --
> SELECT for sure but what about UPDATE -- for each of the tables I've
> granted the user access to?

Right now, GRANT on a table doesn't do anything about subsidiary
sequences.  (There have been discussions about changing that, but
nothing's happened yet.)  So if you want someone to be able to INSERT
into a table with a serial column, you need to give them UPDATE rights
on the sequence.  Offhand I see no direct reason why they'd need SELECT
rights on the sequence, but maybe they do.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Redefined Horizons"
Date:
Subject: Re: Beginner's questions about creating a custom data type in PostgreSQL...
Next
From: "Philippe Lang"
Date:
Subject: Re: Plperl return_next and bytea binary data?