Re: Patch for SQL-Standard Interval output and decoupling DateStyle from IntervalStyle - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: Patch for SQL-Standard Interval output and decoupling DateStyle from IntervalStyle
Date
Msg-id 49113E87.8000801@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for SQL-Standard Interval output and decoupling DateStyle from IntervalStyle  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Patch for SQL-Standard Interval output and decoupling DateStyle from IntervalStyle
Re: Patch for SQL-Standard Interval output and decoupling DateStyle from IntervalStyle
List pgsql-hackers
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> The changes to the documentation all look good.  I did notice one
> final typo that I think was introduced in the latest version.
> doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml:2270 has "Nonstandardrd" instead of
> "Nonstandard".

Just checked in a fix to that one; and updated my website at
http://0ape.com/postgres_interval_patches/
and pushed it to my (hopefully fixed now) git server.

If this'll be the final update to this patch should I be
posting it to the mailing list too for the archives?

> But, apart from that I have no further feedback.
> I will sign off on this one and mark it "Ready for committer" in the commitfest.

Cool.   I'm not sure if anyone still wants to weigh in on the
approach I took for mixed-sign intervals, where '-1 2:03:04'
gets interpreted differently  depending on the date style,
and '-1 +2:03:04' and '-1 -2:03:04' are the way I'm using
to disambiguate them.

> Review of the other two patches coming soon to a mail client near you.

Feel free to do them one-at-a-time too; since no doubt any issues
with the first one will probably affect the second one too.

I think I updated the other patches for the missing whitespace
style issues my first patch had; but no doubt there could be
other bad habits I have as well.
   Ron





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] In-place upgrade
Next
From: "Fujii Masao"
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication patch v1