[Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Melanie |
---|---|
Subject | [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] |
Date | |
Msg-id | 490714C2.6070901@dunslane.net Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]
Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Since the .us list is now slowed down by being a moderated list, I want to confirm before friday that the deletion of my(and whomever else's) email address and then it being readded, did not ALSO result in my vote being deleted. I just assume I don't need to vote again and want to confirm. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:39:06 -0700 From: members-bounces@lists.postgresql.us To: melanie@dunslane.net Your mail to 'Members' with the subject Re: [PgUS Members] PgUS member update, 10/27/08 Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post to moderated list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://lists.postgresql.us/mailman/confirm/members/9582c2b67810a9c3bbfba723959402c7d6b4975f -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [PgUS Members] PgUS member update, 10/27/08 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:45:29 -0400 From: Melanie <melanie@dunslane.net> To: members@lists.postgresql.us References: <20081027163652.06d9139c@jd-laptop> Hey - I had just been unsubscribed and now resubscribed. I assume the vote I already cast was not "deleted" in the process of being unsubscribed? members@lists.postgresql.us wrote: > Hello, > > Let's hope I got this right. If I didn't I apologize. > > This is your PgUS Member Update 10/27, I will keep it brief. The most > current pressing member issue to date is, Elections! That's right, we > are currently holding elections for four additional board seats. That > means you need to vote and the election ends in four days. Here is a > list of your candidates with links to their platforms: > > Richard Broersma > https://www.postgresql.us/elections/2008/richard_broersma > > Andrew Dunstan > https://www.postgresql.us/elections/2008/andrew_dunstan > > Chander Ganesan > https://www.postgresql.us/elections/2008/chander_ganesan > > Ned Lilly > https://www.postgresql.us/elections/2008/ned_lilly > > Greg Sabino Mullane > https://www.postgresql.us/elections/2008/greg_sabino_mullane > > Gavin Roy > https://www.postgresql.us/elections/2008/gavin_roy > > Robert Treat > https://www.postgresql.us/elections/2008/robert_treat > > If you haven't voted yet, now is the time. Voting may be done by > logging into the PostgreSQL.us website and going to the following link: > > https://www.postgresql.us/elections/2008/semi-annual/vote > > General discussion can be had at the low traffic pgus-general list. > Information on this can be found here: > > https://www.postgresql.us/mailinglists > > If you fancy blogs, we have one of those too: > > https://www.postgresql.us/blog > > I will try to keep the member updates to a reasonable minimum but we > want to make sure we are communicating with our members in every > possible way. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to > email me directly. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > >
pgsql-advocacy by date: