Re: specificity of claims - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: specificity of claims
Date
Msg-id 49029745.7010507@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: specificity of claims (was: SEPostgres - ontrack for 8.4?)  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: specificity of claims  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
>>> patent...troll...

Shouldn't the project get a legal opinion on how to handle patent
issues on the lists?

If this project does have access to limited legal resources IMHO
it'd be a worthwhile use of those resources to get an educated
opinion of when, if, and how patent issues should be raised on both
the public (general, hackers) and more private (core) lists.

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: specificity of claims (was: SEPostgres - on track?for 8.4?)
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: specificity of claims