Re: specificity of claims (was: SEPostgres - on track?for 8.4?) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: specificity of claims (was: SEPostgres - on track?for 8.4?)
Date
Msg-id 20081024174417.GF5539@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: specificity of claims (was: SEPostgres - ontrack for 8.4?)  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:35:13AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> I did no such thing. I simply asked if anyone was looking into
> it. There is no suggestion for anyone to go and do it if not, I just
> wanted to know if anyone was currently doing it... maybe I wanted to
> tell them to stop.

Ok, glad to have that cleared up.  In the original context, this is
what I saw:

---snip---
>
> Current status of SEPostgres patch: hopeful, but not assured.
>

Someone mentioned to me that IBM and Oracle have several patents in this area,
is anyone looking into that angle?
---snip---

In my ideolect, responding to "status of patch" with "there's this
other issue, is anyone looking into it?" connotes (but does not, of
course, denote) that the speaker thinks someone _should_ look into
it.  I appreciate that perhaps in your ideolect that connotation is
not present, and my apologies for misunderstanding you.

Best,

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Melanie
Date:
Subject: Re: specificity of claims
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: specificity of claims