Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>> AFAICT, removing an authentication method requires a protocol version
>>> bump.
>>
>> Why would it require that? There would just be some auth method codes
>> that remain reserved but aren't used anymore.
>
> Yeah, I was mistaken. AuthenticationCryptPassword would remain in the
> protocol definition, but the server would just never send it.
Since I've seen no actual objections to this happening, I will go ahead
and do it unless someone objects explicitly :-)
//Magnus
